Mapbox vs OpenStreetMap Geocoding
A comprehensive comparison to help you choose the right geocoding solution for your project.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Mapbox | LatLng (OSM) |
|---|---|---|
| Data Source | Proprietary + OSM | OpenStreetMap |
| Free Tier | 100K requests/month | 90K+ requests/month |
| Pricing Model | Per request after free | Simple flat rate plans |
| Credit Card for Free | Yes | No |
| Global Coverage | Yes | Yes |
| Autocomplete | Yes | Coming soon |
| Batch Geocoding | Yes | Yes (Pro) |
| Self-hosting Option | No | Available |
When to Choose Mapbox
- You need tight integration with Mapbox maps
- Autocomplete/search-as-you-type is critical
- You're already in the Mapbox ecosystem
- You need proprietary POI data
When to Choose OpenStreetMap (LatLng)
- Cost is a primary concern
- You want to avoid credit card requirements
- You prefer open-source data
- You need simple, predictable pricing
- Self-hosting is a requirement
- You want to avoid vendor lock-in
Data Quality Comparison
Both Mapbox and OpenStreetMap-based geocoding provide excellent global coverage. Key differences:
Mapbox Strengths
- Enhanced POI data from commercial sources
- Better coverage for some business listings
- Autocomplete optimized for search UX
OpenStreetMap Strengths
- More detailed mapping in many regions
- Better coverage in developing countries
- Community-verified data with rapid updates
- Detailed building and infrastructure data
- Transparent data sources
Try LatLng Free
Test our OpenStreetMap-based geocoding with 3,000 free requests per day. No credit card required.